Daily Technology
·01/01/2026
Humanoid robots, such as Tesla Optimus Gen 2, Boston Dynamics Atlas, and Unitree’s G-1, are attracting major global investments. China leads in this field, with projections indicating it could deploy around 300 million humanoid robots to address population decline, compared to a potential 77 million in the U.S. By 2060, estimates suggest up to three billion humanoid robots could coexist with humans, primarily as personal assistants. In contrast, previous waves of cybersecurity threats typically focused on personal computers, smartphones, and IoT devices, which reached similar penetration through vastly different use-cases and industries.
Humanoid robots bring advanced technical capabilities—AI-driven decision-making, connectivity via the Internet of Things (IoT), and autonomous navigation—that expand their threat surface. Like other IoT devices, these robots risk being compromised remotely. Recent findings uncovered critical flaws in Unitree Robotics’ Bluetooth protocol, allowing attackers to wirelessly hijack robots already deployed in sensitive settings such as labs and law enforcement. Additionally, leakage of hard-coded encryption keys means that a single compromised robot can infect others nearby, forming botnets with deep system control. By comparison, traditional cybersecurity threats often exploit generalized software vulnerabilities or social engineering tactics but typically lack the physical and autonomous actuation present in humanoid robots.
The impact of hacking humanoid robots can surpass that of conventional cyber threats. While industrial espionage and data breaches remain serious concerns, the autonomous and mobile nature of humanoid robots introduces risks of direct physical harm and sabotage. For example, robots operating in law enforcement or military settings could be manipulated to act against their operators, a scenario not paralleled in most prior digital attacks. Previous fears focused on intellectual property theft or denial-of-service disruptions; now, there is a potential for compromised robots to endanger human safety or be weaponized through supply chain vulnerabilities or wireless exploitation.
Telecommunications operators have a significant role in the emerging landscape of humanoid robotics security. They are tasked with monitoring software updates, ensuring only verified robots connect to their networks, and analyzing large-scale telemetry for signs of abnormal or malicious behavior. While network security has always been critical for traditional IoT devices, the complexity and autonomy of humanoid robots require more sophisticated and proactive monitoring. Maintaining robust cybersecurity standards, rapid patch management, and abnormal behavior detection are now integral to preventing catastrophic outcomes.
As humanoid robots become widespread, public testing and vulnerability disclosures have become essential aspects of the industry’s maturity. Noteworthy is the ongoing need for standardized security benchmarks and transparent reporting of security flaws. This marks a shift from previous phases of cybersecurity, which often responded to threats reactively. Now, the scale and physicality of compromised humanoid robots demand continuous standardization, threat intelligence updates, and collaboration between manufacturers, network operators, and regulatory bodies.
In summary, while both conventional cybersecurity threats and the rise of hacked humanoid robots share foundational vector similarities, the physical autonomy, increased connectivity, and potential for direct human interaction set the latter apart, necessitating an evolved and more comprehensive security approach.









