Daily Technology
·11/02/2026
The integration of artificial intelligence into the corporate world is often presented as a definitive leap toward enhanced productivity. However, recent research presents a more nuanced picture, suggesting that the benefits of AI may come with significant, unintended consequences for employees.
A study conducted by researchers from the University of California, Berkeley, and published in the Harvard Business Review, tracked approximately 200 employees at a technology company over eight months. The findings indicate that while generative AI tools initially deliver a productivity surge, this effect may be short-lived. The subsequent reality for many employees involved more intense workdays, a diminished work-life balance, and a decline in the overall quality of their output.
The core of the issue appears to be a phenomenon of work expansion. Empowered by AI, employees began tackling tasks that were previously outside their skill set or would have been delegated. Instead of reducing their workload, this capability inadvertently led them to take on more responsibilities, creating a heavier and more complex set of duties that proved difficult to manage.
Furthermore, the promise of significant time savings is being called into question. A 2025 enterprise report from OpenAI noted that employees saved, on average, only 40 to 60 minutes per week. The UC Berkeley study corroborates this, finding that any time saved was often negated. The always-available nature of AI tools made it easier for employees to work outside of standard hours, effectively lengthening their workday and blurring the lines between professional and personal time. This led researchers to conclude that AI is more likely to "intensify" work rather than reduce it.
The quality of AI-generated work is another critical factor. Outputs from AI systems are rarely ready for use without thorough human review. This process of correcting errors and refining low-quality AI work, sometimes termed "workslop," adds another layer of tasks to an employee's schedule, counteracting some of the initial efficiency gains.
To mitigate these negative effects, researchers propose a cultural shift within organizations. Recommendations include protecting time for human-to-human collaboration, prioritizing the quality of results over sheer speed, and establishing dedicated focus time for employees, free from AI interruptions. As companies continue to adopt these powerful tools, the focus must shift from simply implementing technology to strategically managing its impact on the workforce to prevent burnout and ensure sustainable, high-quality performance.









