Daily Technology
·23/12/2025
Japan's H3 rocket, developed by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) as the successor to the H-2A, represents over a decade of engineering focused on advancing Japan's launch capabilities. Yet, the recent failure in its seventh mission when the second-stage engine malfunctioned highlights critical issues and raises questions about reliability and future missions, especially when compared to similar international efforts in space launch technology.
The H3 rocket is a 63-meter-tall expendable launch vehicle designed to provide more cost-effective and reliable satellite launches. Its first stage performed nominally during the most recent launch, but the second-stage engine failed to maintain tank pressure, resulting in shutdown and the subsequent loss of the Michibiki 5 navigation satellite. Technical data from telemetry indicated a pressure drop in the second stage's hydrogen tank, delaying first-stage cutoff and second-stage ignition.
Comparatively, other nations’ launchers, such as SpaceX’s Falcon 9 or Europe’s Ariane 5, have demonstrated high reliability after initial development challenges. Falcon 9, for example, utilizes a robust first and second stage with routine, detailed post-flight analysis, resulting in a mission success rate exceeding 95% in recent years. In contrast, Japan’s H3, despite five successful missions following its inaugural failure, now faces its second critical issue related to its second-stage engine.
Space launch vehicles are typically subject to rigorous qualification and acceptance testing to mitigate in-flight failures. Publicly available information on JAXA’s H3 development shows extensive ground tests, but the recurring issues with second-stage operations suggest further refinement is needed. In the industry, regular public announcement of incident investigations, as initiated by JAXA’s task force, aligns with international norms for transparency. This is evident in the approaches taken by NASA or ESA when facing similar anomalies.
The reliability of launch vehicles directly influences satellite deployment schedules and mission planning. The H-2A completed its service with a high success rate, enabling the launch of critical national and international payloads. H3’s mixed record places future missions—including the planned HTV-X cargo spacecraft and Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission—in potential jeopardy, pending the outcome of the ongoing investigation.
Other space agencies have faced similar setbacks during new rocket development. For example, early failures of Europe’s Ariane 5 in the late 1990s led to technical overhauls and eventual market leadership. Japan’s response may follow a similar trajectory, contingent on the effectiveness and speed of its current failure analysis process.
In summation, Japan’s H3 rocket’s technical setbacks, particularly with recurrent second-stage issues, highlight the intrinsic difficulties in new rocket systems’ development. When compared to international benchmarks, sustained reliability and performance improvements, driven by thorough post-flight analysis and system refinement, are crucial for regaining confidence and ensuring mission success in upcoming launches.









